Two so-called “summer blockbuster” movies were recently released to theatres in the grand tradition of past studio offerings. In recent years, the movie industry has had to face the new world of mass-produced entertainment, multiple streaming outlets, large home-theatre screens, and video overload for the public. Notable theatre releases have become rare and the old concept of “going to the movies” is now a quaint memory for us older folks.
Hollywood’s current answer to all of this are two high-budget films, Barbie and Oppenheimer, whose themes and target audiences could not be more different. Linda and I went to see Oppenheimer in all its imax glory, recently. This post is both a review of the movie and a brief retrospective on the real-life J. Robert Oppenheimer and the development of the atomic bomb at Los Alamos, New Mexico. With the success of the Manhattan Project, Oppenheimer and his colleagues not only abruptly ended the War with Japan in 1945, they forever changed the world in which we live while emphasizing the dire need for international peace and cooperation between the peoples of this earth. From all reports, the Barbie film adroitly adds fanciful humor and adult insight to the nostalgia of Mattel’s iconic Barbie Doll – pure entertainment! Oppenheimer tells the story of what, in my personal opinion, is the most dramatic and impactful event in the annals of recorded history – the story of Los Alamos and the development of the atomic bomb and what it portends for humanity.
Central to the drama and historical consequence of Los Alamos are the personal stories of two of the greatest minds in the annals of physics: Albert Einstein and J. Robert Oppenheimer. Einstein was, deservedly, Time Magazine’s Person of the (20th) Century for revolutionizing the physics of space and time with his theories of special and general relativity. If J. Robert Oppenheimer was the father of the atomic bomb, Einstein was its unwitting godfather by virtue of his early findings on relativity. Einstein’s genius and his contributions to physics are second only to those of Isaac Newton (a close call). Oppenheimer’s brilliant mind was, reputedly, and arguably, of course, second to none in recorded history.
“It was clear also at Los Alamos that he was intellectually superior to us” – Hans Bethe, Nobel Laureate in physics
Hans Bethe went on to say that “Oppenheimer was a tremendous intellect,” and that he had never known anyone quite so quick in comprehending both scientific and general knowledge. He recalled that Oppenheimer knew everything that happened at Los Alamos – from the physics laboratory to the machine shop. Similar testimonials left behind by Nobel Prize winning physicists who were recruited to Los Alamos by Oppenheimer and worked under him bear irrefutable witness to his brilliance. Almost to a person, those who were there said the success of the bomb program at Los Alamos could not have happened without “Oppie” conducting the technical orchestration required across multiple disciplines. These testimonials came from the best minds that Europe and the United States had to offer, scientific minds not given to hyperbole. With no managerial experience whatsoever prior to his appointment as THE technical leader on the atomic bomb project – no surprise to anyone – he proceeded to astonish even his scientific colleagues with his ability to quickly acquire and implement the management skills necessary to complement General Leslie Groves’ efforts as military liason in charge of the Manhattan Project – reporting to the highest levels in Washington.
Why were so many European scientists involved at Los Alamos, and why the remote, high-desert wilderness of New Mexico? Significantly, many of America’s top scientific minds in 1942 were recent Jewish refugees who came to this country in the nineteen-thirties to escape the Nazi threat sweeping Europe. Many of them had been working abroad at the cutting edge of the new science of quantum mechanics. Einstein himself arrived here in 1931 for that very reason, although he never worked on the atomic bomb program and remained a resident fellow at Princeton’s Institute for Advanced Study during the war effort where his sole charter was to continue satisfying his curiosity about the laws of nature. The very real possibility that German physicists might be first to develop a nuclear weapon struck terror in the hearts of these immigrants from Europe who had no doubts concerning Hitler’s motives.
As for the unlikely choice of remote Los Alamos as the gathering place for some of the world’s finest scientific minds, there were two justifications. First: absolute military secrecy was a requirement for developing the most powerful weapon known to man. We were at war with both Germany and Japan, and our supposed ally, Russia under Stalin, was suspect at best. Second: Oppenheimer’s prosperous family had access to a cabin in the Pecos Wilderness, near Los Alamos – a place where Robert and his younger brother, Frank, spent youthful summers exploring the landscape on horseback. Oppenheimer knew and loved this high desert wilderness, far from the hum and crowded conditions of academic and industrial centers back east where strict secrecy would be impossible.
It was Oppenheimer who recommended Los Alamos as the site of one of history’s most dramatic developments, and it was Oppenheimer who convinced the necessary legion of Nobel Laureates and the best and brightest of developing young minds to follow him there. He and General Leslie Groves, the military officer who, with Oppenheimer would run the program, could not describe to this mother-lode of scientific talent just where they (and their families – of necessity) were to be relocated or just what they would be working on! Yet most of them signed-on to such a vague circumstance because they believed in J. Robert Oppenheimer and because of the need to insure that German scientists had no unrecoverable, top-secret head start on nuclear weapons technology. Many of the recruits had already surmised that the work at Los Alamos would be connected to the earlier blockbuster reports from Germany that Hahn and Strassman had succeeded in “splitting the atom” in 1938.
Albert Einstein’s “Bit Part” in the Film
Oppenheimer and the Manhattan Project at Los Alamos have the central starring roles in Oppenheimerwhich does an excellent job of telling both stories. Einstein has but a bit part in the film even though it was he, in 1905, who unwittingly paved the long road leading to Los Alamos in the high desert of New Mexico and then onward to today’s massive arsenals of nuclear weapons. Albert Einstein, a world-class pacifist, was never attempting to build bombs. His scientific efforts were motivated solely by an insatiable curiosity regarding nature’s most elusive secrets.
Einstein’s 1905 paper on special relativity ended (almost as a footnote) with the most famous equation in all of physics: e=mc2 which suggests that a tiny bit of mass is equivalent to a very large quantity of energy – the fundamental principle behind the immense destructive power of nuclear weapons. Einstein’s theory of special relativity changed not only our notions of absolute space and absolute time, but our long-held belief that energy and matter are separate and distinct entities – not interchangeable. Einstein’s famous and simple equation expressed that (theoretically, at least) mass and energy are two manifestations of the same entity and that one could possibly be converted into the other – but how? That question had no answer for the next thirty-three years – until 1938 when the two German researchers (Hahn and Strassman) demonstrated nuclear fission in the laboratory on a tiny, experimental scale. Einstein’s mass/energy principle had been visited, and now the die for future nuclear development was cast.
In an atomic bomb, a number of atomic nuclei in fissionable material such as plutonium or enriched uranium 235 are bombarded by atomic particles (bullets). Some of these target nuclei split into separate individual masses whose collective mass is slightly less, in each case, than their original nuclear mass before “fissioning.” High-energy neutrons are released by the fission process (in accordance with Einstein’s equation, e=mc2) which then, like still more random bullets, split neighboring atomic nuclei in still greater numbers and the process continues to build exponentially. Such a run-away “chain reaction” produces tremendous net energy (virtually instantaneously) before the nuclear material is totally spent. The Trinity Test which produced history’s first atomic explosion occurred on July 14, 1945 at Los Alamos. A plutonium core no larger than a bowling ball liberated the energy equivalent of close to ten-thousand tons of TNT – enough to completely flatten a small city with a single bomb.
Imagine the pressures on those involved in the Manhattan Project, especially Oppenheimer. The task? Leveraging the infant laboratory results of Hahn and Strassman from 1938 (fission in a teapot, one might say) and, from that meager beginning, advancing atomic physics far enough to build and demonstrate an immensely powerful, deliverable weapon of war in less than three years while working from a remote, start-from-scratch outpost like Los Alamos. The stakes: ending World War II and ensuring that Nazi fascism would not triumph over the west should Germany initiate a successful bomb program of its own. Imagine the ignominy for Washington and all involved with Los Alamos if, after spending tremendous national resources on the Manhattan Project, the initial test was a dud. Not only was the Trinity test a complete success on July, 14, 1945, but two successful detonations over Hiroshima and Nagasaki ended the war less than a month later.
As for the Film, Itself:
The film, Oppenheimer, is a triumphantly successful effort to bring the complete story alive for the public audience. For those who are scientifically and historically inclined, the film delivers the goods. For those more interested in human beings – their conflicts and their triumphs, the film displays brilliantly, the triumph and tragedy of J. Robert Oppenheimer, the center of gravity for the entire Los Alamos story.
Cillian Murphy is perfectly cast as J. Robert Oppenheimer. The sparse, slender frame/persona is spot-on, the gaunt, angular face and cheekbones register, and the critically important, prominent blue eyes could not have been closer to the real thing. From the many film clips and pictures I have seen over the years, Oppenheimer’s eyes could belie, at times, a piercing impatience with the merely- mortal intellects he found around him, and, at other times, a far-away preoccupation with distant thoughts and formative ideas. What really registered with me was Murphy’s obvious grasp of the personal mannerisms and speech of his subject. Oppenheimer’s exaggerated flair with the ever-present cigarette and his many other gestures are perfectly captured by the actor.
For the typical move-goer, these things might not seem so important to the credibility of the film. To me, they are important, for just as the real J. Robert Oppenheimer was the indispensable ingredient for the success of the Manhattan Project, Cillian Murphy and his fine portrayal is critical to the full impact of the film on those of us who know and understand the human and historic story of Los Alamos. I hope the Motion Picture Academy is listening.
In summary, everything about Oppenheimer, the film and its production, is laudable. It covers a complex four-year period quite completely, accurately, and at a very brisk clip. This is a film everyone should see.
A highly recommended prerequisite to viewing the film, Oppenheimer!
By all means, first watch the 1980 documentary by Jon Else named The Day After Trinity. In only ninety spellbinding minutes, it will beautifully set the scene for you, largely through the first-hand accounts of the scientists and others who lived the story and who personally contributed to Los Alamos’ success. You will understand the fast-paced movie far better after viewing this film. It is an absolute gem of a documentary – my favorite of all the numerous documentaries in my DVD collection – covering many subjects!
Finally, the human drama at-play in Los Alamos and its immediate aftermath – the dropping of two atomic bombs on the Japanese Cities of Hiroshima and Nagasaki which abruptly ended our war with Japan – that is the real message that both The Day After Trinity and Oppenheimer wish to convey. Now it has been done, and it should never be done again. J. Robert Oppenheimer was, in many ways, a victim of the bomb, as were others who worked on the program. The heavy responsibility he bore, and the inevitable misgivings which surfaced over its use ultimately consumed Oppenheimer in his remaining years.
For me, nothing can match the drama and the human lessons that stem from the Los Alamos saga, a story which begins back in 1905 with the purely scientific determination by Albert Einstein that e=mc2, and then proceeds to document the abrupt end of World War II in August of 1945 using the atomic bomb. Today, we struggle with the world-wide proliferation of nuclear weapons – weapons with routinely one-hundred times the destructive power of the bombs dropped on Japan. It is precisely the situation that J. Robert Oppenheimer feared once the nuclear genie was let loose from the bottle.
Despite Oppenheimer’s best personal efforts after the war, the world community never reacted sufficiently to his plea. He felt that the world control of nuclear weapon production and proliferation should have begun “the day after Trinity.” Alas, that did not happen.
Note: As always, the author has no commercial involvement or interest in any product or service mentioned in this document.